Talk:Pol Potism

Welcome to Pol Potism's talk page!

This is the talk page for Pol Potism. Everyone must follow these rules to keep those pages in order.

• Read the Wiki Guidelines and Wikia's Terms of Service before you interact with the wiki and the talk pages.
• Stay on topic. This page is about Pol Potism. Never go off-topic.
• Talk pages are for discussion, not for joking and shitposting.
• In your topic, provide your Wikia signature and the full date before your message. This can be done by typing ~~~~.
• Do not reply to topics that have ended or haven't had a response in a while, also known as gravedigging.

Topics that break any of those rules will be removed and repeated offenses will result in punishment.

File:UserKhom.png - If there is a cultural antiquarian side, then you say it is a cultural progressive?

• File:Daniello.png - Pol Potism is debatable ideology in culture. Year Zero implies destruction of past and tradition, but Pol Potism simultaneously hate modern technologies and values. Culturally antiquarian writes as culturally off-rights.
• File:TheElectricBomb.png TheElectricBomb - The debate on Pol Pot's cultural alignments is complicated. Technically the Khmer Rouge still kept industry in the country, hell there's footage of children working in them. Not defending him of course, but some denounced the Neoluddism claim.
  

Also it would be okay to remove isolationism. They were never really isolated from the world, they were neturally-aligned in comparison to NATO and Warsaw Pact.

• • File:TheElectricBomb.png TheElectricBomb - To anyone reading this, I encourage people to use the Documentation Center of Cambodia. It's a neutral source dedicated to the regime of Democratic Kampuchea and gives you tons of different infos, including survivors of the regime.

Any source on Kropotkin being alleged influence of Pol Pot?
File:Regnaissance.png Regnaissance - I think Pol Pot's cultural stance is very complex. In one sentence, Pol Pot destroyed both traditional and modern/progressive values. Therefore, ultraprogressive reactionaryism may be partially accurate, but not entirely accurate in describing Pol Pot. Pol Pot's cultural beliefs have "transcended the spectrum", I think.
File:Heishangren123.png Heishangren1234 - Strictly speaking, Pol Potism, which advocated the pursuit of a primitive communist society (which is an idealized society that retains elements of reactionary culture) through an ultra-progressive means during the time it was in power in Cambodia, is a form of ultra-progressive reactionaryism.