Editing Manosphere (section)

==="Traditional, Mainstream" Manosphere Thought (Redpill)===
*Modern society has been corrupted by [[File:Fem.png]] feminism.
*There are inherent behavioral differences between men and women.
*Men should adopt a hyper-masculine role and get women to submit to them.
*The concept of the [[File:Redpill.png]] "taking the red pill", a metaphor borrowed from ''The Matrix'', which refers to the "awakening" of men to the supposed reality that society is inherently misandrist and that men are oppressed by women. Conversely, not accepting this ideology is referred to as [[File:Bluepill.png]] "taking the blue pill". 
**There are a variety of other "pills" not from ''The Matrix'', such as the [[File:Blackpill.png]] "black pill", which advocates for fatalism, defeatism for the unattractive, and a deep hatred of women either due to them being corrupted by society or due to their own nature as women, and the belief that they are hopeless in love, romance, sex, and even basic friendship in general. Another one is the "purple pill", a broadly leftist perspective on Manosphere ideology. Other less popular but still notable examples may be the [[File:Whitepill.png]] "white pill" which is the opposite of the [[File:Blackpill.png]] black pill, often seeing itself as a natural progression of the nihilism and defeatism of the blackpill philosophy, and advocates for rejecting the attracting the desires of women, and to instead seek self-betterment.
*Other widely regarded views are that men with various inherited conditions such as mental, psychological or neurological disorders like Asperger's syndrome, [[File:Autism.png]] autism, avoidant personality disorder, schizoid personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, social anxiety disorder or other disorders must "ascend". Often by following certain "teachings" or taking courses made by gurus and pick-up artists on how "normal people attract women". Which in reality, often falls flat on actually making said men more socially normal, and if anything, usually only accelerates the social problems.
*Men are divided into "alpha", "beta", "gamma", "[[File:Triangle-template.png]] delta", "[[File:Krater.png]] omega" and "[[File:Integralismf.png]] sigma" males, where "alphas" and "[[File:Integralismf.png]] sigmas" are sexually dominant and attractive, while "betas", "gammas", "[[File:Triangle-template.png]] deltas" and "[[File:Krater.png]] omegas" are undesirable and unattractive. They also believe women gravitate towards "beta" males for financial benefits. And often believes that women especially attractive ones will keep getting banged by "chads" until they need financial stability which they will use the beta for before often divorcing them for Chad in the end and taking all of his money and children.
*That women (Especially white women, but depends on the region too) tend to be attracted to minorities, i.e. black males over white men. This theory is typically known as the [[File:BBCNews.png]] "BBC" theory (Which won't be said here for obvious reasons).
*That [[File:Fem.png]] feminism has largely if not '''only''' made women more powerful in society over average men, where they have both the advantages of [[File:Trad.png]] traditionalism and [[File:Prgess.png]] progressiveness and none of the disadvantages of both at the cost modern men who have increasingly less power in society and are often entirely disregarded. Therefore, [[File:Pat.png]] patriarchy simply does not exist, (or in the case of certain purple-pill arguments) if it does to some extent, it is merely perpetuated by the [[File:Mat-0.png]] powerful women in society due to their privileged position often not having to work nearly as hard as their husbands if at all and is therefore for men, fake power.
*The power of men in society has been increasingly made weaker because of [[File:Prgess.png]] progressivism and men are slowly being phased out and being seen as "toxic". Therefore, supporting [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] [[Right-Wing Populism|Right-wing Populist]] and [[File:Natcon.png]] [[National Conservatism|National Conservative]] figures is ideal, or in the very least, support politicians who openly pander and dog-whistle to their beliefs, such as [[File:Blump.png]] [[Right-Wing Populism|Donald Trump]] from [[File:Cball-US.png]] America, [[File:Bolsonarism_-_alt.png]] [[Reactionary Liberalism|Jair Bolsonaro]] from [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] Brazil, [[File:Zemmour.png]] [[Reactionaryism|Éric Zemmour]] from [[File:Cball-France.png]] France, [[File:FvD-icon.png]] [[Reactionary Liberalism|Thierry Baudet]] from [[File:Cball-Netherlands.png]] Netherlands, [[File:Duterte.png]] [[Social Authoritarianism|Rodrigo Duterte]] from the [[File:Cball-Philippines.png]] Philippines, [[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]] [[Korwinism|Janusz Korwin-Mikke]] from [[File:Polandball.png]] Poland, [[File:Feiglin.png]] [[National Libertarianism|Moshe Feiglin]] from [[File:Zio.png]] Israel, [[File:Taiwan_People's_Party.png]] [[Big Tent Liberalism|Ko Wen-je]]<ref>Taiwan People's Party chairman Ko Wen-je was condemned by feminists for making several sexist remarks, which included: "Unmarried women above 30 years old are national crisis", apart from allegedly following a sexist [[File:Instagram.png]] Instagram Account with the username ba_board (霸社佈告欄；https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=372461814098356). However, despite his statements towards feminism, he supported several feminist policies such as gender equality courses in Taipei.</ref> from [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan, [[File:PTI(Pakistan).png]] [[Islamic Populism|Imran Khan]] from [[File:Cball-Pakistan.png]] Pakistan, and [[File:LeeJunseok.png]] [[Right-Wing Populism|Lee Jun-seok]] and [[Libertarian Conservatism|Yoon Seok-youl]], both from [[File:Cball-South Korea.png]] South Korea, often with the idea to eventually reform mainstream society back into how it was before, where men had great direct authority in both family roles and in society and where hard-core masculinity and [[File:Trad.png]] traditional values are seen as ideal; or alternatively, that mainstream politics is already too corrupted by [[File:Fem.png]] feminism and [[File:Prgess.png]] progressive ideology and is therefore not worth investing time in. With some manosphere individuals believing in political nihilism regarding the ideas of liberal democracy, some promote the tenants of supporting a violent uprising of beta males against the [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] neo-liberal world order. As aforementioned, The attitude towards the government by Manosphere groups depends on the type of government. Some supported the government if the government was critical of feminism such as the presidency of [[File:Lukash.png]] [[Social Authoritarianism|Alexander Lukashenko]] from [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus (as [[File:Tsikhanouskaya.png]] [[Populism|Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya]] was the leader of the [[File:Cball-Belarus-old.png]] Belarusian Opposition), presidency of [[File:PeoplePowerParty.png]] [[Libertarian Conservatism|Yoon Seok-youl]] from [[File:Cball-South Korea.png]] South Korea and the [[File:Cball-Taliban.png]] [[Jihadism|Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan]] under Taliban rule while some do advocate anti-government sentiments if the government was too pro-women/promoting feminism, for instance the presidency of [[File:Putin.png]] [[Kleptocracy|Vladimir Putin]] in [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia (according to [[File:Male_State.png]] Vladislav Pozdnyakov and Alex Podnebesny), presidency of [[File:DemocraticPartyKorea.png]] [[Big Tent Liberalism|Moon Jae-in]] from [[File:Cball-South Korea.png]] South Korea, and presidency of [[File:DPP-Taiwan.png]] [[National Liberalism|Tsai Ing-wen]] from [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan.