Editing Neoreactionaryism (section)

==Beliefs==
The Neoreactionary movement's ideological foundations consist of multiple ideas that are discussed between the NRx movement's members but may or may not be shared between them.

These include but are not limited to:

===[[File:Post-Bert.png]] Post-Libertarianism===
Post-Libertarianism is a school of thought stemming from [[File:Libertarian.png]] [[Libertarianism]], born out of the need to rectify its contradictions, this is done through a rejection of dogmatic opposition to any government intervention beyond the bare minimum, and instead embracing a more pragmatic approach, in favor of a more proactive government for the sake of maintaining individual liberty, and while this doesn't entail authoritarianism, it's enough for Post-Libertarianism to effectively become dealigned from Libertarianism. While not being libertarian, post-libertarianism still maintains a lot of libertarian ideas such as an affinity towards free markets, skepticism towards state control of information and anti-interventionism.

===[[File:Formal.png]] Formalism===
Formalism is the belief that actual power and recognised power (especially in the form of ownership) should align as closely as possible. The belief in formalism makes the Neoreactionary movement especially skeptical of democratic forms of government, favouring forms of government [[Plutocracy|based on ownership]].

===Royalism===
It is the general belief that absolutist systems of governance work best, specifically when the line of succession is clear (which coincides with Moldbug's criticism of dictatorship).<br> Royalists don't favor a particular mode of succession; some favoring something akin to an elective monarchy (see [[File:Neocam.png]] Neocameralism below) while others favor hereditary monarchism, and such; and is less so an indication of a particular view on the de jure process of [[File:Abmon.png]] [[Absolute Monarchism|monarchies]] than it is an indication of support for the de facto 'virtue' of [[File:Abmon.png]] monarchism (stability and order, which NRx's generally associate with "right-wing" politics and liberty in general).<ref name=":1"/>

===[[File:Neocam.png]] [[Neocameralism]]===
Neocameralism is a form of government proposed by Mencius Moldbug and developed by others as a replacement for representative democracy. Neocameralism is a form of government organised around the profit incentive. As such the Neocameralist system is a system of nigh-absolute rule in which the Monarch-C.E.O. (which Moldbug calls a ''Delegate'', based on the corporate title used by colonial-era Quakers) is accountable to a group of shareholders.

=== [[File:Reservation.png]] Reservationism ===

'''Reservationism''' is an epistemology proposed by Moldbug to promote an use of reason which is neither reducing or transcending it. It aims to counter "automatisms", tendencies for people to follow one or more overly specific cases of reason and apply them to everything subconsciously, and wrongly so. The most common types identified are:
*'''Popularists''', who assume that reason stems from how fashionable ideas are, the most common being the truest. They tend to support [[File:Dem.png]] [[Democracy|democracy]] and [[File:Pop.png]] [[Populism|populism]]. They are considered to be the most annoying.
*'''Literalists''', who claim that reason originates from how immemorial ideas are, the most ancient being the truest. They tend to support [[File:Theocrat.png]] [[Theocracy_(Disambiguation)|fundamentalism]] and [[File:Trad.png]] [[Traditionalism|traditionalism]]. They are considered to be the most stupid.
*'''Algorithmists''', who posit that reason comes from how mathematizable ideas are, the most formulaic being the truest. They tend to support [[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] [[Scientocracy|scientific policy]] and [[File:Algor.png]] [[Cyberocracy|algocracy]]. They are considered to be the most pernicious.
*'''Officialists''', who state that reason comes from how official ideas are, the most propagandized being the truest. They tend to support [[File:Mediastocracy flair.png]] [[Mediacracy|state media]] and [[File:PolState.png]] [[Police_Statism|censorship]]. They are considered to be the most dangerous.
As said above, NRxers notice that people can often follow several automatisms at once, depending on the social context they live in. For example, someone living in a deeply religious uniform community is likely to be both a popularist and a literalist, assuming that the overwhelmingly widespread, perennial beliefs around them are true, or alternatively, a person existing within a highly technical and partisan city is predisposed to follow simultaneously algorithmist and officialist ideas at once, convinced of the virtue of governmental experts in their procedures. Moldbug affirms that all combinations can and do exist in the world, with varying degrees of repartition and intensity.