Editing Manosphere (section)

===='''Left-Wing Manosphere'''====
Taking great influence from the above beliefs of purple-pill manosphere communities, some groups, especially the more [[File:Leftunity.png]] economically left-leaning manosphere identify themselves under various sub ideologies that take great influence from various left-wing ideologies and philosophies, such examples could be that of <b>"Sexual-Marxism"</b> or other similarly aligned ideologies, generally speaking, such groups typically argue that men in society, especially those who are apart of economically disadvantaged groups, such as the poor, racial/ethnic minorities, people with mental disabilities and/or physical deformities are often due to them not having inheriting privileges of the higher-class inevitably seen as ugly, and/or unlovable by the hierarchies put in place by materialist [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] neo-liberal capitalist state and society at large, ensuring they are destined to be lonely and are trusted into a [[File:Caste.png]] lower class, to be avoided and feared by privileged women who often don't understand their priveledge, and because of it, are protected, seen as infinitely more valuable and as the "weaker" sex, and given unfair privileges over their male counter-parts by the state, and are often defended by said state whenever they feel threatened by using the disposability of said men to "protect" them, which in practice, is often used to justify violations of basic human rights due to their status such as [[File:PolState.png]] police brutality, or public lynching's against minority, and mentally disabled, or other low status men to protect (more often than not) privileged white women from their fears of the lower-class men they often view as being either ugly, fat, disabled, weak, mentally ill and/or impoverished, often personifying said groups as "creepy rapists", with most women both psychologically being pre-dispositioned to feel such a way and/or who are being taught said false stereotypes of men, in that they are far more likely to be in danger of rape or much greater violence by men, as well as to believe by default that most (if not all men) they meet have the potential to be like this, and that only if they meet a strong and powerful man who is of high-status, financially well-off, tall, socially dominant, competitive, neurotypical, and often white or at least of a brighter skin tone (commonly referred to as "Chad") who will provide for and protect them from said "creepy" men will she truly ever be safe, thus making most women inherently at least on some subconscious level, overtly sexist, as well as [[File:Caste.png]] classist, ableist and racist with this worldview being deeply ingrained in women throughout modern society. Such left-wing manosphere groups typically argue that this therefore makes them a counter-revolutionary and "bourgeoisie-like" class in regards to their sexual capital, and whose material interests inevitably lead to views which are irreconcilable to true social and economic equality, nor are unable to be negotiated or worked with at least in the long-term, as their interests are by nature opposed to any form of genuine social change, with their existence solely antithetical to the values of a true egalitarian and communist society which would destroy said unjust hierarchies over their male counterparts," While the proposed ideas, methods, and praxis one should take to lead to such a revolution varies widely, many left-wing manosphere groups are more often than not unified in the general idea that a true socialist, communist, or anarchist government would be impossible without large-scale changes regarding females role in society, to the wide-spread disempowerment or taking away of certain privilege's women seemingly have over men, or even phasing out the "female class" entirely due to them in the left-wing manosphere's worldview, inevitably perpetuating an unjust hierarchy against men for their sole benefit. And only after such revolutionary action takes place, could a truly free, classless and stateless society without oppression and unjust hierarchies take its place. Notable left-wing Manosphere movements include Kakuhidou (Revolutionary Alliance of Men whom Women Find Unattractive), an Incel subculture in Japan that adheres to anti-capitalism and [[Marxism]].

*Left-wing male supremacy is a concept present in some [[File:Incel.png]] incel forums that believes average women (at least generally speaking) are predisposed to be selfishly antithetical to broad social and economic justice, leading to gender conflict, emotional or economic damage to men, and ultimately male sexlessness. Background ideological assumptions for this theory have previously been partially advocated by Doctor Wolfgang Lederer in the 1960s,<ref>The Fear of Women by Wolfgang Lederer</ref> and most explicitly by the socialist author Mary Marcy in 1918. Wolfgang makes the argument that women are anti-reform because they were excluded from the creation of society, while Marcy argues that women are counter-revolutionary because they have easier access to heterosexual sex than men. Marcy's thesis has also been reiterated by the modern academics Kathleen Vohs and Roy Baumeister, who wrote ''Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions''. Alex Podnebesny popularized the term vaginocapitalism, and shares virtually all of Mary Marcy's background assumptions as well. Adherents of vaginocapitalist theory who have entered the political sphere, (such as the ALF and the ACI in Russia) advocate for the leading of a male-led sexual revolution in the redistribution of sex, where everyone would get equal access to love, intimacy and sex without men having to transfer their capital and resources to women to perpetuate the vagino-capitalist class. Their utopian vision, rather than their methods, borrows a small amount from the early feminist Charles Fourier.
*'''[[File:Sexmarx.png]] Sexual Marxism''': Just like many other left-wing manosphere movements, Sexual Marxists argue that modern systems like capitalism in regards to sexuality, was in large part created as an extension of the traditional sexual hierarchies within former societies, which often saw a few powerful men having polygamous control over most of the females in a society, with men not within that hierarchy having a significantly smaller chance of sexually reproducing, and that in capitalism, said hierarchies largely continue for the purpose of men to try and compete with and attempt to dominate other men so as to collect a higher-social status above over other men in attempt to increase ones overall sexual success from women, and that it is for the most part women who have contributed as well as who benefited most of all from that exploitative system as (according to Sexual-Marxists) it is in their nature to be "protected" and to seek the most "powerful", "dominant" and "competitive" males in society as a good predictor of what qualifies as a good provider and therefore mate, while in large part, ignoring all other men who don't meet her said qualifications or only using them as temporary acquirement of short-term resources (betabux) out of pragmatism before inevitably dumping them when given the opportunity for men she sees as having more "qualified" traits, therefore making them in (at least according to Sexual-Marists), the leading cause to most of the various forms of oppression in the modern world we see today, and that a true classless and stateless society would be impossible to conceive with such deeply rooted female instincts which lead to the large-scale societal competition and inequality between men.
**<b>Sexual Marxist Policies:</b> Proposed policies by Sexual Marxists vary significantly, however typical arguments a Sexual-Marxist could argue for example could consist of the following:
***Government-funded escorts or prostitutes for incels;
***Legalization of female rape;
***Universally enforced monogamy (or alternatively, enforcing women into male-dominated polygamy and orgies)
***Forcing women seen as discriminatory to forcefully breed with those they are seen as discriminating against, for example, forcing women (especially those who are white) to race-mix as a form of anti-colonial resistance, or for formerly upper-class women to have sex with lower-class men, as a form of class liberation and for able-bodied and neurotypical women to have sex with mentally and physically disabled men as to tackle ableism. 
***The creation of state-ran or communally owned public-sex facilities to help incel men, possibly by using women who submit themselves voluntarily, or by force, such as using female prisoner populations and other women deemed "undesirables" or "counter-revolutionaries" by the regime to create what would essentially be considered in practice to function effectively as "sex-gulags" etc...
***The creation of freely distributed fully-automated sex machines for men as to serve the replacing of human females, possibly with fully augmented artificial intelligence. Possibly to the point where female copulation would no longer be required or even seeing the need for women's survival phased out entirely. 
***For certain GBT+ Manosphere communities, possibly taking influence from above, using modern technology for further research into making males and boys more effeminate and "cuter", to effectively make women obsolete and eventually phase them out entirely. For example, arguing that a society may not truly be free from female-dominated oppression and vagino-capitalism until all "genetic-kulaks" are purged from the world entirely. This idea is highly popular among radical sexual Marxists and anarchists who see women's hypergamy as an unjust hierarchy and is therefore needed to be destroyed at all costs in order to form a true classless, and stateless society and that anyone who sympathizes with women and advocates for women's advocacy even self-describes revolutionaries are actually counter-revolutionary and are therefore not real communists/anarchists.