×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 9 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Ceremonial Monarchism

Wiki is in the process of importing stuff

Please be patient

"In its practical working from year to year, the Commonwealth is, and each State also continues to be as a State what it was as a colony, a Crowned Republic, i.e. a community monarchical in its form, but republican in its spirit and operation, and indeed more democratic than many republics are."

Ceremonial Monarchism (CerMon), also referred to as Crowned Republicanism (CrownRep), is a Non-Quadrant political ideology and the most common form of monarchism today. In a ceremonial monarchy, the monarchy is limited to only ceremonial functions (occasionally also emergency functions), while actually running the country is left up to someone else, usually, but not always, the parliament and the head of government.

History

[edit]

At the end of Queen Victoria's reign, the British Monarchy's power diminished and became a ceremonial monarchy. Now the British Parliament and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and their equivalents in Commonwealth realms, do all the heavy work. All the ceremonial monarchies today are: File:Cball-Antigua.png Antigua and Barbuda, File:Cball-Australia.png Australia, File:Cball-Bahamas.png The Bahamas, File:Cball-Belgium.png Belgium, File:Cball-Belize.png Belize, File:Cball-Cambodia.png Cambodia, File:Cball-Canada.png Canada, File:Cball-Denmark.png Denmark, File:Cball-Grenada.png Grenada, File:Cball-Jamaica.png Jamaica, File:Cball-Japan.png Japan, File:Cball-Lesotho.png Lesotho, File:Cball-lux.png Luxembourg, File:Cball-Malaysia.png Malaysia including the 9 Malay states with a monarch, the File:Cball-Netherlands.png Netherlands, File:Cball-Newz.png New Zealand, File:Cball-Norway.png Norway, File:Cball-Papua NG.png Papua New Guinea, File:Cball-Kitts.png Saint Kitts and Nevis, File:Cball-Lucia.png Saint Lucia, File:Cball-Vincent.png Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, File:Cball-Solomon.png Solomon Islands, File:Cball-Spain.png Spain, File:Cball-Sweden.png Sweden, File:Cball-Tuvalu.png Tuvalu and the File:Cball-UK.png United Kingdom, with Sweden and Japan constitutionally forbiting the monarchy from having any role in government.

File:Cball-Australia.png Australian Model

[edit]

The Australian Model refers to a political and economic framework that emerged in Australia during the 20th century, blending liberal democracy with pragmatic social and economic policies. Its development was influenced by historical federalist structures and the country’s position within the Anglo-Atlantic sphere, emphasizing File:Atlanticism.pngAtlanticism and alignment with Western allies. The model sought to balance economic growth with social stability, producing a distinct form of File:AusModel.pngeconomic rationalism combined with File:Welf.pngwelfarism.

Central to the model is a File:Fed.pngfederalist structure that distributes power between national and state governments, supporting File:Parl.pngparliamentarianism and representative institutions. It emphasizes File:Liberal Democracy.pngliberal democracy, where civil liberties and political pluralism coexist with structured governance. In practice, the system has relied on File:Murdoch.pngmediacracy, with public opinion and media institutions exerting significant influence over political discourse, and File:PatConlib.pngpaternalistic conservative liberalism, guiding policy with an emphasis on stability, moderation, and long-term planning.

Socially, the Australian Model promotes File:Multicult.pngmulticulturalism, integrating diverse communities into the civic and economic fabric while fostering national identity. Economically, it balances free-market principles with social intervention, sometimes categorized as File:RightSocDem.pngright-social democracy, supporting both market efficiency and public welfare programs. The model has also expressed support for File:Glib.pngGreen Liberalism, reflecting environmental considerations in policy design, and File:Zio.pngZionism, demonstrating selective international alignment.

Overall, the Australian Model represents a pragmatic compromise between liberal ideals, economic rationality, and social protection, seeking to harmonize diverse societal needs while maintaining institutional stability. Its influence extends to contemporary policy debates in governance, social equity, and environmental management.

The British Model is a historical and contemporary framework for governance and social organization in the United Kingdom, rooted in a blend of monarchy, parliamentary traditions, and gradual social reform. Its origins trace back to the constitutional evolution of Britain, combining monarchical authority with a representative legislature, particularly the File:Arist.pngHouse of Lords, which anchors an aristocratic element in governance. Early forms of this system exhibited File:Timocracy.pngtimocracy, emphasizing rule by the socially and economically privileged, before evolving toward broader constitutional structures.

Religiously, the British Model is intertwined with File:Anglican Theocracyf.pngAnglican Theocracy, where the Church of England historically played a central role in state and social affairs. Politically, the system combines File:Parl.pngparliamentarianism with File:Patcon.pngpaternalistic conservatism, reflected in policies emphasizing social stability, incremental reform, and governance guided by elite oversight. This paternalism extended to public welfare, resulting in File:Welf.pngwelfarism, while also integrating elements of File:Progconf.pngprogressive conservatism and File:Onenatcon.pngone-nation conservatism, aiming to harmonize social cohesion with economic growth.

Economically, the model balances File:Econlib.pngeconomic liberalism and later File:Neoliberal-icon.pngneoliberalism, fostering market-driven development alongside social safety nets. Governance often featured File:MI6.pngpolice statism, a regulatory apparatus to enforce law and maintain order, and File:Moncap.pngmonarcho-capitalism, blending dynastic authority with capitalist frameworks. The British Model also emphasizes File:Atlanticism.pngAtlanticism, aligning the UK with Western powers, while promoting File:Intercult.pnginterculturalism and selective File:Zio.pngZionism in foreign policy.

Devolution has been a significant feature of modern iterations, enabling regional governance within a federalized framework, reflecting File:Nordeastmodel.pngdevolutionism. The system relies on File:Mediocracy.pngmediocracy, with media institutions shaping public discourse and political legitimacy. Overall, the British Model represents a unique synthesis of tradition, aristocratic influence, economic pragmatism, and social paternalism, maintaining continuity while adapting to evolving democratic and global pressures.


File:Cball-Canada.png Canadian Model

[edit]

The Canadian Model is a governance and social framework shaped by both British parliamentary traditions and North American federalism. It operates under a constitutional monarchy, blending File:Fed.pngfederalism with centralized oversight through the Crown, a hallmark of File:CorpCrown.pngCrown Corporatism, which organizes governance around elite, state-linked institutions. Historically, the model evolved from File:Soclib.pngsocial liberalism, balancing individual rights with public welfare.

Politically, the Canadian Model incorporates File:Parl.pngparliamentarianism, allowing elected representation alongside executive oversight. It exhibits a measure of File:IllibDem.pngilliberal democracy, with constraints on direct populist influence and strong institutional checks. The system also supports File:Progfem.pngprogressive feminism and File:ProgSocauth.pngsocial authoritarian progressivism, integrating egalitarian social policies with structured state authority. Economically and socially, it leans on File:Statlib.pngstate liberalism and the File:Auth3Way.pngThird Way, combining market mechanisms with social welfare programs to create a moderated, pragmatic governance approach.

Cultural and identity policies emphasize File:Multicult.pngmulticulturalism, ensuring representation and support for diverse communities within a shared national framework. On foreign and symbolic policy, it maintains ties with Western political norms and promotes File:Zio.pngZionism. Controversially, some aspects of historical infrastructure, labeled hyperbolically as File:CanadianBlueshirt.pngNazi Retirement Home, highlight the complex intersections of institutional conservatism and administrative legacy within certain social systems. Overall, the Canadian Model reflects a hybrid of liberal-democratic principles, state-managed social welfare, and pragmatic governance balancing regional diversity and national cohesion.

File:Cball-Japan.png Japanese Model

[edit]

The Japanese Model refers to the post–World War II political and economic system that developed under American occupation and matured during Japan’s rapid economic growth. It blends constitutional monarchy with parliamentary governance, creating a structure often described as File:AuthLibDem.pngauthoritarian liberal democracy, formally democratic, yet dominated for decades by a single political force. The long rule of the Liberal Democratic Party produced what scholars call a File:SemiAuthPar.pngdominant-party system, sometimes labeled File:LDP(Japan).pngJimintōism, after the party’s Japanese name.


At its core, the model combines File:Parl.pngparliamentarianism with File:Moncap.pngmonarcho-capitalism. The Emperor remains a symbolic head of state, while executive authority rests with elected officials. Politically, it reflects File:ModCon.pngmoderate conservatism and strong File:JPNModnat.pngJapanese patriotism, reinforced by File:JapanFolk.pngcultural Shintoism as a civil identity marker rather than a strict theocracy. Governance has often leaned into File:Police.pngpolice statism in matters of public order and national security, though within constitutional limits. Decision-making power has historically skewed older, producing elements of File:Gero.pnggerontocracy in party leadership and bureaucracy.


Economically, the system fused File:Keynes.pngKeynesianism with state-guided industrial policy during the high-growth decades. The Ministry-led coordination between government and industry encouraged export-driven development, while also fostering File:CronyCap.pngcrony capitalism through tight ties between political elites and major corporations. Socially, Japan built a significant File:Welf.pngwelfare apparatus with healthcare, pensions, employment protections, even as market competition intensified. In recent years, the country has projected a form of File:Pinkcap.pngpink capitalism, promoting selective LGBTQ+ inclusion within a broadly conservative framework. Almost all large cities including Japanese media have a thriving LGBT culture without western intersectionality, Nichome and BL etc being the most famous due to Japan is much more into privacy and compartmentalisation than many other cultures.


Internationally, the Japanese Model is anchored in File:Atlanticism.pngAtlanticism, particularly its security alliance with the United States. It is firmly File:Anticommunism.pnganti-communist, historically positioned against both File:Anti-Juche.pngJuche ideology and File:AntiDengism.pngChinese Dengist governance, largely for strategic and geopolitical reasons rather than ideological crusading. Contemporary diplomacy also shows clear File:AntiPutinism.pnganti-Putinism, especially in response to territorial disputes and security tensions. At the same time, Japan experiments with File:Captrans.pngcapitalist transhumanism, investing heavily in robotics, AI, and longevity science as responses to demographic aging.


The result is a hybrid system: capitalist yet state-coordinated, democratic yet tightly managed, traditional yet technologically ambitious. It runs on stability, order, and it adapts to global pressure and domestic change.

File:Cball-Spain.png Spanish Model

[edit]

The Spanish Model refers to the political system that emerged after the 1978 Constitution, following the death of Francisco Franco. It represents Spain’s transition from authoritarian rule to a constitutional parliamentary monarchy. This shift marked a decisive break from File:Franco.png Francoism, which had centralized power, suppressed regional identities, and limited political pluralism. The new framework institutionalized File:Parl.png Parliamentarianism, embedding executive authority within a legislature elected through proportional representation, while maintaining a constitutional monarch as head of state.

A defining feature of the Spanish Model is File:Nordeastmodel.pngdevolutionism. The 1978 Constitution created autonomous communities with significant powers over education, health, and regional governance. This was a direct response to historical tensions, particularly in Catalonia and the Basque Country. Instead of strict centralism, Spain adopted a quasi-federal structure decentralized, but still constitutionally unitary. The aim was national unity without erasing regional identity.

On the international stage, Spain firmly embraced File:Atlanticism.pngAtlanticism, joining NATO in 1982 and aligning with Western European and transatlantic institutions. This was a major pivot from earlier isolation under Franco. At the same time, Spain integrated into the European project, reinforcing liberal-democratic norms and economic modernization.

Ideologically, the modern Spanish system often reflects File:Progconf.pngprogressive conservatism balancing market economics and European integration with welfare protections and social reforms. Political competition between parties like the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party and the People's Party has shaped this equilibrium, alternating between center-left and center-right governance without dismantling the constitutional structure.

Historically, Spain’s earlier phases included File:Cball-Spanish Empire.pngimperialism, when it governed vast overseas territories, and periods of File:Cball-2Spainrepub.pngrepublicanism, particularly during the First (1873–1874) and Second (1931–1939) Republics. Those republican experiments ended in instability and civil war, paving the way for Franco’s dictatorship. The contemporary Spanish Model is, in many ways, a negotiated settlement between those past extreme's monarchy and republic, centralism and autonomy, tradition and modernization.

Personality and Behaviour

[edit]
  • CerMon is usually seen with File:Mediastocracy flair.png Mediacracy taking pictures of them.
  • They are laughed at by their family members whenever they try to voice they opinion (if they even bother to say anything).
  • They are very spoiled and can be seen pestering their File:Conmon.png parent to give them stuff.

How to Draw

[edit]
File:Cermon Cockade.svg
Cockade of Ceremonial Monarchism

Ceremonial Monarchism is symbolized by the purple version of the Cockade of France (The symbol of File:Republicanismpix.png Republicanism).

  1. Draw a ball,
  2. Around the edge of the ball, draw a thick purple outline,
  3. Draw a magenta circle in the centre,
  4. Color the rest of the ball white,
  5. Draw a crown on top (gold for the crown and red for the jewels),
  6. Add the eyes, and you're done!
Color NameHEXRGB
 Purple#541A55rgb(84, 26, 85)
 Magenta#B83FBArgb(184, 63, 186)
 White#FFFFFFrgb(255, 255, 255)
 Gold#FFEF01rgb(255, 239, 1)
 Red#EA1A1Ergb(234, 26, 30)

Relationships

[edit]

Friends

[edit]

Frenemies

[edit]

Enemies

[edit]

Further Information

[edit]

Literature

[edit]

Articles

[edit]

Wikipedia

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. Depends on where it is. Almost all large cities including Japanese media have a thriving LGBT culture without western intersectionality, Nichome and BL etc being the most famous due to Japan is much more into privacy and compartmentalisation than many other cultures.
  2. Pure Vanilla Cookie is likely based on File:Jesus.png Jesus Christ, and abdicated as the king of the kingdom despite the Vanilla Kingdom still considers him as the de jure head of state.

References

[edit]
  1. Critics of powerless monarchs like usually File:Lpop-tinfoilhat.png Left-Wing Populism accuse them of being a net drain that lives in luxury, especially during after Elizabeth II had died in 2022 which critics on File:Twitter.png Twitter had celebrated due to variety of reasons.
  2. During World War II, the Canadian government banned Technocracy Inc. in 1940.
  3. https://megalodon.jp/2025-1231-0521-44/https://en.wikipedia.org:443/wiki/Shinjuku_Ni-ch%C5%8Dme
  4. https://ghostarchive.org/archive/kZacM
  5. All monarchs named Charles have dissolved parliament thus far.
  6. The Coronation showed Charles is a truly modern, multicultural monarch
  7. Allegedly, the crown has regained control of its own finances
  8. Taishō was severly ill both physically and mentally throughout his life he played only a limited role in politics and undertook no official duties from 1919.
[edit]
[edit]

zh:礼仪君主制