×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 53 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Revision as of 18:07, 30 June 2026 by Gamingskeleton49 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Wiki is in the process of importing stuff

Please be patient

"We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence."

Eugenicism, also called Galtonianism, is a political ideology which seeks to shape public policy in accordance with the field of eugenics. Eugenics is now a mostly discredited field of science ('pseudoscience') which claims to be the 'study of good genes'. Eugenics takes influence from the Darwinian theory of evolution, which posits that organisms evolve to adapt to their environment through the process of natural selection, and applies it to humans. This is done by selecting traits which are 'desirable' and artificially adjusting factors in an environment to either maximize the reproduction of those with those traits (positive eugenics) or minimizing the reproduction of those with undesirable traits (negative eugenics).

History

[edit]

Proto-Eugenics

[edit]

Early forms of Eugenics were practiced for millennia, with some cultures (such as Athens, File:Sparta.png Sparta, Indigenous Peoples of Brazil and File:Res Publica.png Rome) letting children who were considered to be defect be killed (infanticide). The philosopher Plato advocated for the state to control the reproduction of human beings.[2][3]

19th and early 20th Century

[edit]

The term 'Eugenics' and 'Dysgenics' were coined by the English polymath Sir Francis Galton in the 1860's after reading Charles Darwin's On The Origin of Species.[1]

Nazi Eugenics

[edit]

Nazi eugenics refers to the social policies of eugenics in Nazi Germany, beginning with Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring. The racial ideology of Nazism placed the biological improvement of the German people by selective breeding of "Nordic" or "Aryan" traits at its center.

Those targeted for destruction under Nazi eugenics policies were largely people living in private and state-operated institutions. They included prisoners, degenerates, dissidents, and people with congenital cognitive and physical disabilities- people who were considered to be feeble-minded:

  • Epileptic
  • Schizophrenic
  • Manic-depressive (now known as bipolar)
  • Cerebral palsy or muscular dystrophy
  • Deaf and/or blind
  • Homosexual or "transvestites" (intersex and transgender people)
  • Anyone else considered to be idle, insane, and/or weak as per "feeblemindedness"

All of these were targeted for elimination from the chain of heredity. This took the form of forced abortion, forced sterilization, or mass murder by lethal injection.

Discrediting

[edit]

Early criticism of eugenics came from the American sociologist Lester Frank Ward,[8] the English writer File:Chesterton.png G.K. Chesterton,[9] German-American anthropologist Franz Boas,[10] and the Scottish physician Halliday Sutherland.[11] In 1930 was officially condemned by Pope Pius XI in his encyclical Casti Connubii[12]

Nonetheless, major action against eugenics was mainly taken only after the Second World War.

Contemporary Eugenics

[edit]

With the development of technologies which allow for more effective forms of genetic engineering the interest in the revival of eugenics has picked up steam in certain circles, including some File:Transh.png transhumanist circles. Eugenics was defended by the New Zealand professor of ethics Nicholas Agar in the form of what he called File:Libeugen.png 'liberal eugenics' in his book of the same title.[13] Liberal eugenics (also called New Eugenics) unlike historical eugenics seeks to involve parents themselves in the process of eugenics, seeking to respect the parent's right to choose what genetic features they deem desirable for their children and to ignore the advice of eugenicists.[14]

Doctrine

[edit]

W.I.P.

How to Draw

[edit]
File:EugenicsFlag.png
Flag of Eugenicism
  1. Draw a ball
  2. Fill it with black
  3. Draw a red DNA strand
  4. Finish with the eyes!
Color NameHEXRGB
 Black#121212rgb(18, 18, 18)
 Red#FF0000rgb(255, 0, 0)


Relationships

[edit]

Superiors to have as many kids as possible

[edit]

Questionable

[edit]
  • Feminism - A lot of your early proponents supported me, claiming that giving women more rights would lead to a better race, and we have a mutual love of Margaret Sanger, but why do you want equality and hate it when your opponents tie you to me?
  • Manosphere & Alt-Right - Sex Realism is based but you are too pro-life and pro-Neetcel sometimes plus most you are on asd
  • Scientocracy - We used to be friends, but we've had a falling out of sorts.
  • File:Darwinist.png Social Darwinism - You took this all way too far.
  • File:Transh.png Transhumanism - Why would you want to enhance people with bad genes? And genetic engineering will render selective breeding obsolete.
  • Nazism, File:Showa-kanmuri.png Showa Statism & File:Ittihad.png Ittihadism - My ideas in practice. But all of you lost, so now you're considered inferior. Also, all of you tarnished my reputation.
  • Racial Nationalism - My fanboy who doesn't understand me, like, at all. Seriously, "pure race" isn't a "better race"!
  • Ethnonationalism - Same as above.
  • White Nationalism - Caucasian version of the two above.
  • Pol Potism - On one hand, you're just a more violent form of kakistocracy that likes to kill smart people. On the other, you liked me and tried to eliminate disabled people, despite your methods being too primitive. Either way, a mixed bag.
  • Neoluddism - You... don't do abortion, but I'm pretty sure technology, medicine, Red 40, and fluoride, (all side effects of the Industrial Revolution), do cause disabilities.
  • Marxism-Leninism - Many of your ideas sound pretty cringe, but Lenin had an eugenics program, and apparently Stalin embraced me later on?[15]
  • Ethnopluralism - International segregation is great, but why won't you agree on mass sterilization?
  • Post-Humanism - You are a machine without any biological genes and designed artificially. But on other hand, you are perfection (especially if you evolve into ASI).
  • File:Nordmodel.png Nordic Model - We used to be friends until you stabbed me in the back.
  • File:Ford.png Fordism - Look I'm not even questioning your method here, I just really don't see why you have to deliberately making part of your population dumb.

Ret##ds to be castrated

[edit]
  • Kakistocracy - "Three generations of imbeciles are enough!" Now, just let me remove your balls.
  • File:Religious.png Most religions - Sterilization and abortion is good actually, at least against the lessers.
  • File:Incestism.png Incestism - Disgusting degenerate who has a fetish about his sister. What do you mean selective breeding of humans will cause a collapse of genetic diversity?
  • Climate Skepticism - DON'T DESTROY THE GENE POOL OF WILDLIFE YOU DERANGED SON OF A BITCH! DO YOU EVEN REALIZE THAT BY DESTROYING THE ECOSYSTEM, YOU’LL END UP RUINING OUR CHANCES OF SURVIVAL!?! AND NATURE BEING “INFERIOR?” REALLY!?! TYPICAL CONSUMERIST, PRO-TRUMP PEASANT TRASH!!!
  • Progressivism - Ableism is good actually. Also, why did you have to severe our friendship we had a century or two ago?
  • Conservatism - "abORtiOn iZ muRDEr!" Yes, and? admit it, you secretly gay for me.
  • Reactionaryism - Embrace enlightenment and science, you stupid react##d. Also, the earth is not 6000 years old.
  • Posadism - While a global nuclear war will kill off a lot of the weak, it will kill a lot of the strong too!
  • Multiculturalism - Absolute shame.
  • Libertarianism - Free choice? Are you out of your mind??
  • File:Humanismpix.png Humanism - Why do you hate me so much? I'm doing this because I wanna improve humanity!
  • Welfarism - Helping disabled "people" is feeding useless eaters. Aktion T4 go brr.
  • File:Radlib.png Radicalism - Libtard who believes in universal welfare.
  • Ergatocracy - Communism and Kakistocracy have a child?! If you'll excuse me... *rushes away to barf*
  • Biological Leninism - My worst nightmare...
[edit]

Further Information

[edit]

Literature

[edit]

Articles

[edit]

Wikipedia

[edit]

By Region

[edit]

Videos

[edit]

Websites

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. 1.0 1.1 Correspondance between Charles Darwin and Francis Galton
  2. 2.0 2.1 Republic, Book 6, Plato
  3. 3.0 3.1 Eugenics, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  4. https://www.estadao.com.br/internacional/mengele-odiou-viver-no-brasil-um-pais-multicultural-afirma-jornalista/?srsltid=AfmBOoprxPFuZNeXLFjGtPSzRvidVhvc-b-VBzNEblRsra2ZE_kszhYc
  5. Project 100,000
  6. https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2025-09-05/national/northKorea/UN-report-points-to-medical-experiments-infanticide-targeting-disabled-people-in-North-Korea/2392447
  7. The Amazon Prime adaptation renames it to the Nazi American Reich or American Reich for short.
  8. Eugenics, Euthenics and Eudemics by Lester F. Ward
  9. Eugenics and Other Evils by G.K. Chesterton
  10. Eugenics by Franz Boas
  11. Birth Control: A Statement of Christian Doctrine Against Neo-Malthusians by Halliday Sutherland
  12. Casti connubii by Pope Pius XI: Those who hold the reins of government should not forget that it is the duty of public authority by appropriate laws and sanctions to defend the lives of the innocent, and this all the more so since those whose lives are endangered and assailed cannot defend themselves. Among whom we must mention in the first place infants hidden in the mother's womb. And if the public magistrates not only do not defend them, but by their laws and ordinances betray them to death at the hands of doctors or of others, let them remember that God is the Judge and Avenger of innocent blood which cried from earth to Heaven.
  13. Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Advancement by Nicholas Agar
  14. Defending Eugenics by Jonathan Anomaly
  15. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/884623
[edit]

Recent changes

  • RedHandsome128 • 52 minutes ago
  • RedHandsome128 • 54 minutes ago
  • RedHandsome128 • 58 minutes ago
  • RedHandsome128 • 1 hour ago
  • Discord