×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 11 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Crusade of Romanianism

Revision as of 01:28, 6 March 2026 by Techpaleobert (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Wiki is in the process of importing stuff

Please be patient

"I no longer believe in any idea, in any party, in any man. By logical consequence: there is nothing that would determine me to take on the role of a militant for any doctrine or program. I AM THE ETERNAL OPPONENT."

Crusade of Romanianism is an economically left-wing, File:Libsoc.png libertarian, File:InfReactionaryism.png culturally far-right and File:Ultranat.png ultranationalist ideology. It is File:Anticap.png anti-capitalist, File:Anticommunism2.png anti-communist, File:AntiNazism.png anti-Nazi, File:Antifa.png anti-Fascist and hates some Jews for Economic Reasons.

History

[edit]

Originally called the White Eagles, Crusade of Romanianism was a splinter group of the File:Legion.png Iron Guard, created by Mihail Stelescu and Alexandru Talex to offer an alternative to all the political parties that were present at that time in Romania. Later, Panait Istrati would join The Crusade after an exchange of letters back and forth between the three figureheads, and he will add his own thoughts and ideas to the mix aswell.

The group will start to experience hardships first with the death of Istrati, and later on because of the assassination of File:StelescuThought.png the original founder of the movement by File:Legion.png a death squad. What followed soon was a short disintegration of The Crusade, mainly due to the fact that no one was pleased with the new Leadership and soon resignations started to appear, leading to a total dissolution in 1937.

Beliefs

[edit]

The main ideas that seemed to revolve around the movement were a mix of Anti-Authoritarianism, File:RevNat.png Revolutionary Nationalism (Because the Group was set on "reviving" a "New Romanian") and a strong support for a Socialistic Economy.

The Crusade rejected any implementation of File:Fash.png Fascism, File:Nazi.png National Socialism, Bolshevism on File:Cball-Romania.png Romanian land, and strove for originality in finding solutions for the problems the country was facing at that time. They expressed their hatred for all the parties in File:Cball-Romania.png Romania, stating that they are nothing more than cheap copies of something they saw abroad, as well as seeing them as a type of "gang loyalty" that should be directed to the Nation as a whole instead.

There are some variations to those beliefs in the File:PanaitIstratiThought.png File:StelescuThought.png two main figureheads of The Crusade. File:StelescuThought.png Stelescu was much more anti-Marxist than Istrati, proposing instead for everyone to come together and form a File:NationalistSoc.png "Worker's Nation" with a bottom-up hierarchy. File:PanaitIstratiThought.png Istrati, on the other hand, took much more inspiration from File:Orthlen.png Lenin and File:Trot.png Trotsky, praising the former as being a File:TharMonarch.png "True Monarch" and the latter for his File:Dem.png democractic ideas.

Personality and Behavior

[edit]

Crusade of Romanianism is an eccentric, very nationalistic Romanian who enjoys reading novels by Panaiti Istrati and his nation's traditions. He is more of a loner and is not well-known, much less understood as an ideology. His views are seen as rather wacky by the File:Legion.png Iron Guard's main wing and is often mocked or shunned by them. Yet, he still aggressively criticizes Capitalism, File:Ormarxf.png Communism, File:Sec.png Authoritarianism, File:Nazi.png Nazis, File:Fash.png Fascists, File:Jewish Capitalism.png Rich Jews and the Iron Guard's leaders with a burning passion.

How to Draw

[edit]
File:Crusade of Romanianism flag.svg
Flag of Crusade of Romanianism
  1. Draw a ball;
  2. Color it dark red;
  3. Draw a white shield;
  4. Add the eyes and you're done!
Color NameHEXRGB
 Carmine#97151Frgb(151, 21, 31)
 White#FFFFFFrgb(255, 255, 255)


Relationships

[edit]

Friends

[edit]

Frenemies

[edit]

Enemies

[edit]
[edit]

Portraits

[edit]

Comics and Artwork

[edit]

Further Information

[edit]

Wikipedia

[edit]

Literature

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. "For the good management of a state, it is necessary to form an elite of leaders. There is no possibility of a regime without this elite. It must command, dictate, and the subordinate elements should execute. The elite must have a leader, its exponent, born from within itself, and by no means should the leader choose, out of the desire to be a chief, a staff of bowing servants. This elite, in turn, must not create subordinate elements as partisans, because in this case the collaboration is not done by virtue of a belief, but of an interest, and since there is interest, there is compromise and the goal it's missed. I do not understand, for example, why, since the incapacity of a minister is found and his ousting is predicted, this ousting brings with it the fall of the entire government, through the pressure of the clique and personal partisans, at the mercy of the latter." Mihail Stelescu (2023). My Crusade, Or Ours?. Black Front Press. pp.19
  2. "Class, in the Marxist sense of the word, is a deliberately artificial delimitation, with all the real appearances of existing, but which collapses in front of a Nation, which understands that in its entirety it forms a class, a working nation...The difference between a bourgeois and a proletarian consists only in education and wealth. Either of these two things can be leveled through another education and a fair distribution of wealth. Marxists condemn the class struggle where native, fundamental differences still can and do exist. One race is distinguished from another by soul and physical structure, by qualities and defects with atavistic depths distant in time and yet, for Marxists, the antagonism between classes is eternally maintained and fueled by hatred, which between races seeks to be mitigated. If race hatred is called savagery by Marxists, then class hatred, fictitious and false, is more: it is criminal." Mihai Stelescu (2023). My Crusade, Or Ours?. Black Front Press. pp.42
  3. "Lenin was the purest of monarchs. That is: the devoted man who wanted nothing for himself, but everything for mankind. He was the man without “family”, without “friends”, without “relatives” without camaraderie. Although an absolute dictator over 160 million souls, Krupskaya continued to patch his pants. And when, during the terrible famine of 1922, the peasants brought him mounds of butter and eggs, he would send them to the supply center and demand that the common ration be served to him, this is why, when an embryo of the camarilla once tried to put the decision “to the vote”, he stood up like a god and shouted: “If you continue to discuss this, I will go out into the street and call the sailors for help!” Panait Istrati (2023). My Crusade, Or Ours?. Black Front Press.
  4. "IF the “crusaders”- or people bearing another name, but having a permanent revolutionary mentality - were once called to govern, they can only be monarchists...When the Monarch proved to be of divine essence, the peoples deified Him. When he was but a bloody puppet in the hand of an equally bloody chamber, he collapsed. When thousands of people understood to die in order to give meaning to the words Liberty, Equality Fraternity, these words were some torches that led humanity on the dark paths of destiny. When from the same words people have made nothing more than an inscription that can be read on the frontispiece of all the prisons in France - they fade away, they die" Panait Istrati (2023). My Crusade, Or Ours?. Black Front Press. pp.31
  5. "If our democratic doctors, entirely true scientists, will laugh at this thesis, declaring that the practice of democracy in the bosom of a dictatorship is a fantasy of painters, I will send them to Trotsky, in whose programme there exists such goal: the democratic party of the Russian communist and the granting of freedom of expression of thought in life Soviet public. Or maybe Trotsky is also a painter? Or maybe what is possible in Russia, which is threatened by all internal earthquakes, is impossible in Romania, which is the most compassionate?" Panait Istrati (2023). My Crusade, Or Ours?. Black Front Press. pp.29
  6. https://docdro.id/3GWeDYd
  7. "When Mussolini yawns in Rome, the Codreanists prostrate themselves on the ground, and when Hitler laughs in Berlin, Mr. Vaida feels obliged to laugh too. So does our gathering of communists who feel cold in their mouths when Stalin drinks water in Moscow. All with thoughts, souls and eyes abroad. Many swear and turn off the “radio” devices when they hear the national anthem, but they listen to Horst-Vessel, Giovinezza or the International." Mihail Stelescu (2023). My Crusade, Or Ours?. Black Front Press. pp.49
  8. "Fascism and Hitlerism will serve us as elements of comparison in our studies, serving us with the painful experiences and abdications that each made, in order to avoid them here. But the “Crusade” will also seek to be a school of high civic and moral dignity. Because our target is not power, we do not need the chaff of mediocrity, but elements of creation, people with the embers of purity in their souls and the flame of truth in their eyes. The friends who reach out to us and to whom we extend it, both they and their comrades, will never be able to buy, through this gesture of friendship, the silence about the mistakes they will commit." Mihail Stelescu (2023). My Crusade, Or Ours?. Black Front Press. pp.50
[edit]